Otherness

In most family businesses, conflict is described as a disagreement over money, roles, or documents. That description is convenient, because it keeps the problem outside the self. The deeper truth is more unsettling. Conflict begins when the family loses the ability to hold otherness within clear and respected limits.

Otherness does not mean hostility. It means that the person across the table inhabits a different inner logic. A different sense of risk. A different relationship to time. The founder carries the memory of creation and the fear of collapse. The next generation carries the burden of comparison and the anxiety of legitimacy. An operating sibling experiences pressure as daily exposure. A non operating sibling experiences distance as exclusion. Each position produces its own coherence. Conflict emerges when these logics collide without boundaries that allow them to coexist.

Families often speak of unity. What they frequently seek is sameness. Sameness feels reassuring because it reduces complexity. Yet a multi generational enterprise cannot be sustained on sameness. Time itself produces difference. Markets evolve. Education reshapes expectations. Marriage enlarges the circle. The family becomes plural, whether it wishes it or not. When plurality is denied, governance turns theatrical. Meetings become rituals of avoidance. A minor decision then detonates years of unspoken tension, not because the issue matters, but because recognition has been postponed too long.

The task of governance is not to eliminate conflict. It is to transform raw opposition into a form that can be carried without humiliation. This requires limits. Limits between authority and voice. Between ownership and management. Between respect and obedience. Otherness without limits becomes intrusion. Limits without recognition become domination. Governance exists to protect difference by giving it shape.

This work also demands realism. Not all tensions dissolve. Some oppositions are tragic rather than technical. They persist because the underlying logics are both intelligible and incompatible. Governance does not abolish tragedy. It contains it, so that disagreement does not become rupture.

Tolerance is insufficient. Tolerance keeps the other at a safe distance. Engagement is more exacting. It asks each party to enter the reasoning of the other without surrendering their own. It poses a difficult question. What would have to be true for the other to be acting in good faith. This question does not weaken leadership. It disciplines it.

Continuity is not achieved by erasing difference. It is achieved by recognising it early, framing it clearly, and bearing the asymmetry of responsibility that leadership requires. Otherness acknowledged becomes wisdom. Otherness denied becomes war.

W.