top of page
Search

Knowing When to Quit

Updated: Aug 29

There are moments in mediation when persistence no longer serves the process but begins to undermine it. The mediator must have the discernment to recognise when remaining in the room betrays the very purpose of their presence. If the parties refuse to engage in good faith, if dialogue descends into theatre, or if mediation is reduced to a tactic for delay or manipulation, the mediator’s role ceases to be constructive. It no longer opens doors but closes them, no longer builds trust but corrodes it.


To step back is not to fail. It is to affirm principle. The mediator’s duty is to preserve the integrity of the process, not to deliver an outcome at any cost. Walking away when the conditions for progress are absent reminds the parties that mediation is a privilege, not an entitlement, and that its strength lies in their own sincerity. By withdrawing at the right moment, the mediator protects the dignity of the process and keeps alive the possibility of return, leaving the door open for dialogue when the parties are ready to meet it with honesty and intent.


W.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Fidelity

Last friday's ’s Financial Times feature on Fidelity and the family behind it offered more than a corporate chronicle. It revealed the quiet resilience of a dynasty that has endured for nearly eight d

 
 
 
Style

Throughout my life’s journey, I have had the privilege of crossing paths with leaders of many kinds. Some radiated calm authority, others embodied restless ambition. Some led through conviction and cl

 
 
 
Revelations

A recent case reported in yesterday's Wall Street Journal illustrates this new landscape. An unexpected biological daughter surfaced through a DNA match and brought a claim on an estate. The court dee

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page